This is from Moschino’s Cheap and Chic line.
It should have been Cheap Or Chic, as I’m pretty sure I only agree with one of those adjectives. You’ll have to convince me that collar is not made of Play-Doh, and I think those powder puffs were just on clearance at Target.
[Photo: Getty]
 |
Want To See The Farrah Abraham Sex Tape? We've Got It! – The Frisky |
 That's Not Me Naked! – FOX News | |
| Ashley Tisdale Strips Down To Teeny Tiny Bikini – Huffington Post | |
| Who Is The Most Hated Celebrity In Hollywood? – FOX News | |
| Is This Really The Most Beautiful Woman In The World? – Huffington Post | |
| Kim Kardashian's Pregnancy Scare – FOX News |
Comments (34):
The shoes! Will no one think of the shoes?
Right? What’s with the jelly sandals? They’re fine for the beach, or gardening, but to appear at an event… well, then again, this is the same girl who chose that, are we calling it a “dress,” now?
What an absolutely crazy-person look. I have questions.
Are jellies back!?
Jelly shoes always make me think of toe jam. They just seem… unsanitary.
I thought they were crocs! No joke!
Same! I immediately thought, “Formal Crocs?!” And then my brain broke.
Sunday? Nice.
Oh right, it’s GFY’s birthday!! Congratulations to Jessica and Heather for 8 fun years! You rock.
Yes, happy bday!!!
Eep! I did not realize this was the actual birthday! Congratulations on 8 great years, and thanks for making a post on the day!
Even if it’s this. I think I have a possible explanation. Looking at the photo full-size, it is apparent that there are dangling threads at the hem, and clearly the dress has never been tailored. It’s as much as maybe a couple of sizes too big for her, as compared to its runway appearance.
So my guess is, on the way to the gallery, poor Azealia here got drenched by an unexpected downpour or a curbside puddle being driven over (her hair is kind of a mess, too), her original beautiful outfit was ruined, and the only store nearby was whatever London’s equivalent of Target is.
Honestly, the entire “Cheap and Chic” line just looks cheap. I can find better quality for a tenth the price at Marshalls, and that isn’t sarcasm.
No kidding. I just got a really pretty Tahari sundress at Marshalls for, I believe, $59.99. Have gotten heaps of compliments on it. I wouldn’t buy the bulk of my wardrobe there (and I don’t always have time to dig), but sometimes they have good finds.
Shoes. Why? No.
You are not 8 years old and on the playground. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200.
Actually, do collect $200, and use it to buy better shoes.
I like the way you think.
I feel like this could be an “Unfug it up” if you gave the play-doh collar to some pre-schoolers, removed the Tribbles from the hem, and gave her some pretty shoes instead of JELLY SHOES seriously I love them them in the right environment but not with this. She’s young (I guess she’s young–she looks young, anyway) and pretty enough to wear something covered in iridescent fish scales and look great.
She is way too pretty for this monstrosity.
What possessed her? She actually looked at this dress with its orange collar and said, “red plastic shoes?” I say, “The power of Christ compels you… The power of Christ compels you…”
I bet it actually wasn’t cheap, either. It just looks that way. What’s with the shiny scales? Does My Little Pony do unicorns now?
I love this!
Because I am radiantly, drop dead gorgeous by way of comparison.
I’m pretty sure the shoes are really, really fancy Crocs. And you should really only wear such a thing if you’re on the crew of Oprah’s yacht. So this is wrong.
The problem here is not the dress. It is crazypants, but in that fun, cheeky way that Moschino does so well. Someone like Kruger or Saldana could carry this off with aplomb. No, the real issue is those horrible, horrible shoes. They should be burned immediately.
Can you even have heels on jelly shoes? IIRC (from 1985, so maybe I don’t), that gawd-awful plastic wasn’t the most stable.
It’s not play-doh, it’s Kraft singles, which are on her dress because she is the new fillet o fish spokes-character, A-SCALE-ia.
I could see the collar and pailettes in a mini, with nice strappy heels, but from her thumbs down this is an unfashionable, unflattering monstrosity. It’s like Phyllis Diller’s later stage outfits.
This dress looks suspiciously similar to a Prada design from a year or two ago…
What could’ve been a cute look is completely ruined by those shoes and hemline.
Ditch the fur and go with a pair of gold brogues and she would’ve looked perfect.
General rule: If you can pair it with jelly sandals, it’s not a good choice.
Also: JELLY SHOES WHAT. My 5 year old daughter has a pair of those in purple. And even SHE refuses to wear them.
@Leah: LOL!
God almighty!
Clown-y.
Hideous.
Wow this is the ugliest thing I’ve seen in a while!
FUGLY. So damn fugly.
Which is worse, dress or shoes?!…or dress AND shoes?! … Eeek!