Oh, DON’T YOU START, Reaser.
At this rate Dakota Fanning will show up at the next one wearing a towel.
[Photo: Getty]
Oh, DON’T YOU START, Reaser.
At this rate Dakota Fanning will show up at the next one wearing a towel.
[Photo: Getty]
![]() |
Want To See The Farrah Abraham Sex Tape? We've Got It! – The Frisky |
That's Not Me Naked! – FOX News | |
Ashley Tisdale Strips Down To Teeny Tiny Bikini – Huffington Post | |
Who Is The Most Hated Celebrity In Hollywood? – FOX News | |
Is This Really The Most Beautiful Woman In The World? – Huffington Post | |
Kim Kardashian's Pregnancy Scare – FOX News |
Comments (21):
What is going on with her hair? (Clearly, Im just ignoring the dress.)
Um, yes. I really cannot look beyond the fact that she should never ever, ever ever ever never ever ever never wear her hair like that. She could not pick a more unflattering style for her head/face.
Exactly! It makes her head look weirdly huge and shiny like a helmet. (And honestly, I don’t know if anyone on Earth can pull that dress off.)
Honestly, I am much more disturbed by the hair than the dress.
Looks like something Lea Michele would wear – without the netting.
This is kind of a young look for her.
I had that thought too. She’s 37 so not old, but the sheer and the barely-covered breasts and the short skirt make it a look better suited to someone younger and edgier, I think. Rihanna could pull this off because she’d really go for it with dramatic makeup and hair and shoes; Elisabeth Reaser is kind of half-assing it with sensible pumps, barely-there makeup, and a downright school-marmy hairstyle.
My first thought was, “When did Reaser raid Rihanna’s closet?”
How does that Eagles song go? ‘Desperate-o, why don’t you come to your senses?’
Supremely unflattering to her chesticles.
And to her legs and to her head… which separately are fine.
I’m just loving “chesticles” too much to continue.
She is way too pretty in a “classic” beauty way to be wearing that.
Mutton. Lamb. She should stick to classier looks. She’s so elegant when she does that.
She always has this smug look on her face and I feel conflicted because I don’t know if that’s just her face or if she’s just a smug person. So enigmatic, is our Elizabeth Reaser.
Is this a little young for her? Yes it is. : )
I irrationally hate her, so perhaps it is because of the smug look? Anyway, her horrible outfit couldn’t have happened to a better person, as far as I am concerned. (Based on zero evidence, of course.)
So many bad outfits in Hollywood these days…is there a conspiracy to make women look this bad? And do they really look in the mirror before they go out and think they look good? That is the truly baffling part.
I love the dress but it’s way to young for her
Oh my goodness!
I feel like she’s always trying to prove that even though she plays the mother of a bunch of vampires, she’s not actually matronly. So she finds herself in competition with Kristen and Nikki on the red carpet. Which…isn’t working for her.
This screams DESPERATE! Plus, holy forehead, Batman!