Fugger: Kristen Stewart

Fug or Fab: Kristen Stewart


Okay, this is weird, but my first thought upon seeing this photo was, “Have we EVER seen Kristen Stewart’s toes before?”

I mean, we probably have, but… have we? I feel like her go-to heel is a plain black closed-toe pump, and even with the experimenting she’s done lately, she hasn’t gone toe-naked yet. Which is not necessarily important, except that I am somebody who for a really long time didn’t like wearing shoes that showed any of my feet, because feet are the worst. Maybe she’s shedding inhibitions, or maybe she is just really jazzed about her pedicure. I don’t know. It’s a step. As for the whole outfit, I like the leather dress comceptually, but think it’s a touch too snug — when your clothes give you topography you don’t have, it’s time to rethink the number on the tag. The main issue for me is the eye makeup. She looks like a Grace Jones junkie, and not in a fun way where she suddenly starts wearing things that you suspect might inflate.

Add it all up and then tell me what you get:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

[Photo: Getty]

react:

On Fug Road


Okay, but I do love her make-up.

react:

Fugloween 2012


Here are two things I’ve learned from doing postings this Halloween: 1) I am pretty sure Chris Brown’s costume is going to make your head explode, and b) I’d best not even try to ID most of these costume for fear of angering Fug Nation when I get it wrong. Some folks are REALLY disgusted that I happen not to have seen Moonlight Kingdom. It’s like I personally knifed them, just because I can’t watch or get to the movies as much as I’d like. Please forgive, Fug Nation. I hate it when we fight. At LEAST wait until I can acquire and don some leggings as pants, so that your disappointment can be complete.

[Photos: WENN, Fame/Flynet, Pacific Coast News, Bauer-Griffin, INF]

react:

Fug or Fab: Kristen Stewart


It’s nice that the Twilight: Breaking Dawn: Part II: Twilightier people haven’t forced her and Rob to pose for pictures together yet.

react:

Fug the Poster: Twilight: Breaking Dawn, Part 2


In which we learn it’s impossible to take a picture of three people running toward camera without them looking super weird and awkward. But not as super weird and awkward as a poster of Kristen Stewart and R Pattz canoodling given the uncertainty of their Epic Love, so CONGRATULATIONS, Lionsgate and Summit! PS: I have NO IDEA who that dude is behind R Pattz, and I’ve seen all the movies. He looks vaguely like Colin Farrell, so I’ve decided that some time last summer, Colin Farrell and Michael Sheen got wicked drunk together and Sheen convinced Farrell to take a minor yet pivotal role in the final Twilight movie, and his part as  — from what I can tell from his costume — a feral Seattle DJ really just took on a life of its own. I mean, listen: they have about twenty minutes of book-action left to cover in this movie, so you know they had to make up about 75% of the plot. Why NOT Colin Farrell as DJ Chaz MountainMan, a wily human who totally seduces Edward with his smooth mash-ups of olde timey 1930s love songs and the latest house music?

Or, you know, maybe it’s Jackson Rathbone and his wig is just REALLY EXTRA TERRIBLE in this one. Either works for me.

react:

Fug or Fab: Kristen Stewart


So, she and Pattinson broke up, and she came out looking really clean and fresh; she and Pattinson allegedly maybe supposedly are hooking up again on the down-low, and suddenly the hair goes wonkus again and she looks kind of tired. Good for the sex life, but not great for the follicles?

Thoughts?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

[Photos: Pacific Coast News, WENN]

react: