Fug or Fab: Sienna Miller

fug-or-fab
Jul 22, 2009 By Jessica AT 12:12 pm

I have a confession to make.  It is really going to shock you. So, I took a little mini-break to Portland this past weekend and I lugged all my magazines onto the plane to do some catch-up reading. I was like three months behind on Vogue. And I finally got to the Sienna Miller issue and I was reading her profile in it and…she came off kind of charming. I KNOW. But she seemed kind of rueful and self-deprecating and like…normal. I know, I’ve got years of complaining about her behind me but I am willing to admit that I kind of liked her after I read the article and maybe it was just the altitude talking but there you are. Don’t worry. I’m SURE this won’t last. Although she’s being a good sport about what happened on this recent G.I. Joe photocall:

I guess someone had the bright idea to transport the actors across the Thames in one of those white-water-rafting-type boats and Sienna, obviously, got drenched en route. Hee. I have to say, good on her for just going with it.

But let’s take a look at her pants:

We can learn several things from this photo, the primary one being that Sienna Miller is short, but also that Rachel Nichols IS in fact continuing to work after having had to slog through that terrible last season of Alias, which might have made me decide to be like a dairy farmer or something. I have also learned that I suspect Sienna’s pants would look better with a belt, in that loose pleated-y pants with belt loops look weird to me with a tucked-in shirt, something I had not previously given much thought to. It seems everything Sienna Miller-related is a learning experience for me lately.

poll by twiigs.com

Fug file: Fug or Fab, , ,
react: