Remember when the Pussycat Dolls were a thing? Seems so far away, doesn’t it? And that’s as good a reason as any why Melody Thornton shouldn’t have worn this:
Because now we can’t tell if she’s just wearing really awful harem pants, or she’s actually seeking employment IN a harem. Hey, times are tough. I just wish she’d tried Hammer pants first. He’s probably a better boss — both too legit to quit AND prone to laying out quite clearly what you can and can’t touch.
[Photo: Pacific Coast News]
Kimberly Wyatt is SO my favorite Pussycat Doll. She’s even dressed as the literal interpretation of such:
I mean, yes, some kind of crazy, tore-up slutty doll, topped with the fur of the most bedraggled pussycat EVER — but I appreciate the literalism. Also, the craziness.
I guess Kimberly Wyatt here is officially an ex-Pussycat Doll, per the caption that came with this photo. And now Google tells me the group broke up at the end of last year. Whatever shall I do. Wherever shall I go.
[Photo: PacificCoastNewsOnline.com]
@wondertwinA Depends -- are you Vanessa Hudgens?
Kimberly Fugyatt
Remember when the Pussycat Dolls were a thing? Kimberly Wyatt surely hopes you do, as she’s releasing a solo album this year called — wait for it — “Derriere,” which is almost as delicious as that time Bai Ling was shopping a book called Nipples.
And while this dress isn’t so much about the derriere, it DOES hope you will spend considerable time dissecting it front half. It LOOKS like you can ssee panties and a bra, but then, it ALSO looks like you can see BLUE panties, when in fact those are sequins. It’s the illusion of the illusion of transparency. That’s going deep, people. That’s two layers of deception. It’s a pity both of those layers look like they cost ninety-nine cents and/or came out of a party store confetti cannon.
[Photo: WENN]
react: