For me, the exciting thing about Vogue putting Adele on the cover was them putting Adele on the cover. To me, this isn’t Adele. This is Amber Heard. And I don’t mean to knock on Amber Heard, who could be the nicest person ever to put on false eyelashes, but a) she is no Adele, b) I’m pretty sure she would ALSO tell you that she is no Adele, and c) if you are making Adele look like every cookie-cutter Playboy Club-style starlet out there, you’re taking away what makes her Adele. And now that I’ve gotten that out of my system, let’s check out how Adele represented at the Grammys and see if we all feel like there’s still a fire burning in our souls.
[Photos: Getty]
























@catherinegelera I hate you for that - J

Fug the Cover: Drew Barrymore
Everything about this cover so stiff and awkward.
How ironic that the headline says “It’s Drew!” when in fact nothing about this photo bespeaks Drew Barrymore to me except the fact that she provided its original genetic material. Her hands look like the photographer walked up to her, placed them there, and said, “IF YOU MOVE THAT HAND ONE MORE TIME I SWEAR I’LL TURN THIS CAR AROUND.” She also looks sedated, and possibly also severely Photoshopped, into an expression of supreme sleepy smuggery. And if they were going to monkey with her face, why didn’t they adjust the fact that the shirt makes her left boob look like it’s being arrested by an ace bandage?
react: